Electrochemically solid phase microextraction based on molecularly imprinted polymer-carbon nanotubes composite
Electrochemically controlled solid
phase microextraction (EC-SPME) was proposed as an alternative to classic SPME
for the enhanced isolation of ionic or ionizable compounds (1). EC-SPME is
based on the application of a potential difference between the sample and the extracting
phase, and therefore special conducting coatings, such as those based on polypyrrole,
are required.
Classic SPME coatings lack of
extraction selectivity due to their hydrophobic nature. As we've
mentioned in previous posts (I, II), molecularly imprinted polymers enhance
the recognition selectivity through hydrogen-bonds, ionic interaction, and
size-shape matching. In a recent article, published in Analytica Chimica Acta,
Liu et al. have proposed a nanocomposite as special coating in EC-SPME for the
selective extraction of fluoroquinolones from water samples (2). The
nanocomposite is based on the combination of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which
increase the stability and mechanical strength of the fiber, and a conducting molecularly
imprinted polymer which improves the selectivity.
The synthesis of the nanocomposite
consists of different steps. First of all, a layer of multiwalled carbon
nanotubes is deposited in a platinum wire by an electrochemical process which
involves the application of an electrical potential difference between two
electrodes immersed in a suspension of carboxylic CNTs. In a subsequent step,
the MIP layer is prepared by the electropolymerization of pyrrole in the
presence of ofloxacin which is used as template molecule. The MIP nanocomposite
presents a high porous structure compared with that synthesized in the absence of template
(NIP).
Among all the involved variables,
the applied electrical potential is especially interesting since it has a
double effect on the extraction performance. On the one hand, it improves the
extraction of the analytes but on the other hand it may produce the over-oxidation
of the coating.
In the article, the readers will
find some interesting information concerning the synthetic process, the
optimization of the extraction procedure and the comparison between the NIP and
MIP performances.
References:
(1) Electrochemically Controlled
Solid-Phase Microextraction Based on Conductive Polypyrrole Films. Link to the article
(2) An electrochemically enhanced
solid-phase microextraction approach based on molecularly imprinted
polypyrrole/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite coating for selective
extraction of fluoroquinolones in aqueous samples. Link to the article
Related
posts:
(I) Thin films of molecularly
imprinted polymer for the selective extraction of proteins. Link to post
(II) Smart molecularly imprinted
hydrogels for protein recognition. Link to post
Comments
Post a Comment