Switchable hydrophilicity solvents in the microextraction context
The concept of switchable solvents (SS) was firstly introduced by Canter in
2006, in the framework of industrial processes. The initial idea was to
introduce solvents which can switch between a polar and non-polar chemical
form, aiming to reduce the number of organic solvent and toxic wastes generated
during extraction procedures [1]. Recently, professor Jessop and co-workers
expands the application field of this kind of solvents in order to develop
cheaper and greener chemical processes.
Jessop proposed gaseous CO2 as trigger reagent to switch between
the two chemical forms of the SS (see equation 1), which is pretty interesting since
it is cheap, easily available and non-toxic. Moreover, it can be easily
introduced and removed from the solution, thus simplifying the
"switching" process. Solvents presenting this behavior were named as
"switchable hydrophilicity solvents" (SHS) as they are miscible with
water in the presence of CO2 while become immiscible when CO2 is
removed. This removal can be simply achieved by bubbling the
solution with N2 or Ar.
NR3 + H2O
+ CO2 ⟺NR3H+ + HCO3- (Equation 1)
SHS were firstly used as substitute of hexane in soybean oil extraction. In
this case, SHS avoid the traditional separation by distillation, minimizing ht
environmental impact and reducing the overall economic and energy costs of the
process by substitution of the distillation process [2]. Recently, SHS has been
successfully employed for removing solvent from products such as algae oil in
bio fuel production [3,4], bitumen [5] and high density polystyrene [6].
Several solvents showing this behavior had been
identified, most of them amidines and tertiary amines [7,8]. It is also
available a small group of Ionic Liquids (IL) which present a switchable
behavior [9]. One of the IL shows exactly the opposite polarity change in
presence of CO2: tetrabutylphosphonium N-tri-fluoro-methanesulfonyl-leucine became hydrophobic when CO2 is
dissolved in an aqueous phase containing the IL.
Table 1 summarizes the main SHS employed and indicates two principal
properties, namely the logarithm of the octanol/water portioning coefficient
(log Kow) and the negative logarithm of the acid dissociation constant (pKa)
[10].
Table 1. Main
studied amines presenting switchable behavior
|
|||
Compound
|
Ratio in water
(v:v)
|
log Kowa
|
pKaH
|
Triethylamine
|
1:1
|
1.47
|
10.68
|
N,N-Dimethylbutylamine
|
1:1
|
1.60
|
10.02
|
N,N-ethylpiperidine
|
1:1
|
1.75
|
10.45
|
N-methyldipropylamine
|
1:1
|
1.96
|
10.40
|
N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine
|
1:1
|
2.04
|
10.48
|
N-buthylpyrrolidine
|
1:1
|
2.15
|
10.36
|
N,N-Diethylbutylamine
|
1:1
|
2.37
|
10.51
|
N,N-Dimethylhexylamine
|
1:1
|
2.51
|
10.18
|
a Calculation based on ALOGPS 2.1 software
(adapted from [10])
|
The ideal SHS should present a log Kow value in the range from 1.2 to 2.5.
Solvents presenting lower values are too hydrophilic and generate monophasic
system in its neutral form. Solvents with higher values generates a biphasic
systems even in the presence of CO2. The pKa values should be higher than 9.5. In
addition to these requisites, it is desirable for a SHS to be a non-volatile
solvent, generally with a high molecular weight. The main reason, is that the
common way to eliminate CO2 from the solution is by bubbling another
gas (such as N2 or Ar), and it could lead to partial/complete losses
of SHS.
Our research group has recently proposed the adaptation of SHS as solvents
in microextraction. In this case, we used N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCA)
[11] as solvent under a homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction (HLLE)
format. The miscibilitation of DMCA and water in a 1:1 v/v ratio is accomplished
using dry ice. The resulting solution is injected in a defined volume of
aqueous sample where the DMCA is completely solubilized. For phases´s
separation, sodium hydroxide has been proposed instead of N2 bubbling
since the evaporation of SHS can have a dramatic effect when the solvent are
used in the microliter range. After the extraction, DMCA with the target
analytes is recovered for further analysis.
The SHS-HLLE procedure was evaluated by extracting benz[a]anthracene from
water samples. Fluorescence detection was selected as instrumental technique to
take advantage of the native photoluminescence of the target analyte. However, during
the optimization process, we found that DMCA quenched benz[a]anthracene
fluorescence. To solve this issue, a dilution (1:1) with acetic acid (HAc) was necessary (see Figure 1).
The dilution avoided quenching and produced a 35 % increase in the fluorescence
intensity compared to that obtained in pure methanol.
We suggest the reading of this article to the blog´s followers (Link to the article). In the
original manuscript, they will find the complete optimization as well as the
analytical characterization of the proposal.
REFERENCES
[1] N. Canter Tribol. and Lubric. Tech. 62 (2006) 15-16.
[2] P. G. Jessop, L. Phan, A. Carrier, S. Robinson, C. J. Dürr, J. R.
Harjani, Green Chem. 12 (2010) 809–814.
[3] A. R. Boyd, P. Champagne, P. J. McGinn, K. M. MacDougall, J. E.
Melanson, P. G. Jessop, Bioresour. Technol. 118 (2012) 628–632.
[4] C. Samori, D. L. Barreiro, R. Vet, L. Pezzolesi, D. W. F. Brilman, P.
Galletti, E. Tagliavini, Green Chem.15 (2013) 353–356.
[5] A. Holland, D. Wechsler, A. Patel, B. M. Molloy, A. R. Boyd, P. G.
Jessop, Can. J. Chem. 90 (2012) 805–810.
[6] P. G. Jessop, L. Kozycz, Z. G. Rahami, D. Scheonmakers, A. R. Boyd, D.
Wechsler, A. M. Holland, Green Chem. 13 (2011) 619–623.
[7] P. G. Jessop, L. Phan, A. Carrier, S. Robinson, C. J. Dürr, J. R.
Harjani, Green Chem. 12 (2010) 809–814.
[8] P. G. Jessop, L. Kozycz, Z. G. Rahami, D. Schoenmakers, A. R. Boyd, D.
Wechsler, A. M. Holland, Green Chem. 13 (2011) 619–623.
[9] Y. Kohno, H. Arai and H. Ohno, Chem. Comm. 47 (2011) 4772–4774.
[10] J. R. Vanderveen, J. Durelle, P. G. Jessop, Green Chem. 16 (2013)
1187-1197
[11] G.
Lasarte-Aragonés, R. Lucena, S. Cárdenas, M. Valcárcel, Talanta 131 (2015)
645–649.
Guillermo
Lasarte-Aragones studied Biochemistry in the University of Córdoba (Spain)
until 2007, getting later on a Master degree in "Molecular, cellular an
genetic biotechnology". In his early research, Guillermo worked at
mitochondrial redoxins and molecular defenses against oxidative stress using
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as model organism. Nowadays he is developing his PhD
Thesis under the supervision of Prof. Valcárcel, Cárdenas and Lucena at the
same University. His work is focused on the innovative uses of carbon dioxide
on the development of novel microextraction techniques.
Guillermo on twitter: https://twitter.com/LasarteG
FQM-215 Research group:
https://www.uco.es/grupos/FQM-215/
Comments
Post a Comment